
You know, I'm not easy to insult. But today, not only have I been insulted by a national news outlet. So has every person who has ever enjoyed reading or authoring a romance title. And yeah, I'm pretty steamed up about that.
I've long suspected that major news outlets such as
MSNBC don't bother check facts before posting content to their websites under the guise of "truth".
Lo and behold, today MSNBC proved me right.
Perhaps, as a
romance author, I should feel gratified that a national news outlet cares enough about knowing who reads romance as to run a
poll on their site. Even bad press is good press, right?
Perhaps in this case, no.
Judging by the choices the pollsters posted to determine the reading habits of their readership, nobody at MSNBC has bothered to read a romance in this century. In order to tell the pollsters that I read romance titles, I had to refer to my genre of choice as a "bodice ripper."
I find this behavior insulting and degrading to my genre, my publishers, and to women in general.
If MSNBC's pollsters had done one iota of homework before designing their poll, they would have discovered that romance publisher guidelines unilaterally exclude activities that can be construed as demeaning/negative toward women, such as bodice ripping, a flowery euphemism for rape.
Futher, lets look at the poll results. Romance titles compose sixty five percent of books purchased in America every year. Romance titles outsell every other genre of fiction. The romance publishing industry is one that is largely run by women, for women.
Judging by the poll "results" which says most people deny reading romance, either a whole lot of people are lying, or the association of romance with the term "bodice ripper" was perceived as distasteful.
Perhaps MSNBC ought stick to the news.
Then again, if these are the sorts of skewed polls we will witness during the upcoming election, I truly fear for the future of democracy.